This is your area for International news, please send
to Web@dsiso.org and it will be added
to your country heading................
Report from CEO to Sports Assembly
At
the Sports Assembly of 2004 in
Durban
the CEO was asked to pursue the possibility of recognition for Down
Syndrome swimmers by the International Paralympic Committee (IPC)
Since that time number of discussions have taken place with
members of the IPC; by letter, by e-mail and in personal meetings; the
last of these meetings being in
Beijing
at the time of the 2008 Paralympics.
Throughout
DSISO have stressed the need for the IPC to recognise the fact that
swimmers with Down Syndrome have both an intellectual disability and a
functional disability.
There have
been two responses to this argument consistently from the IPC.
- The
first is that Down Syndrome (DS) swimmers can compete as S14 with
other intellectually disabled (ID) swimmers.
It has been pointed out that due to the additional functional
impairment (the term used by the IPC to describe a physical
impairment) swimmers with DS are disadvantaged by swimming against
swimmers with ID only.
- The
second argument is that swimmers with DS may compete against other
functionally disabled swimmers in S10.
However it would be necessary to prove that swimmers with DS
do have a functional disability.
Those
of you who work consistently with DS swimmers know that they have
functional disabilities. Therefore,
I contacted many of you to let me have any evidence you have to support
the claim that swimmers with DS have a functional disability.
However, not a single piece of evidence was forthcoming.
As many of you know I am also an Executive Member of INAS-FID, the
international organisation recognised by the IPC as the body that
represents athletes with an Intellectual Disability.
Although currently working towards the re-inclusion of ID athletes
into the Paralympics, INAS-FID is still a recognised member and, for
swimming, Class 14 swimmers are still recognised by the IPC and other
National swimming organisations.
With
this in mind I have had informal discussions with the President of INAS-FID
Dr Bob Price, the IPC President Sir Philip Craven, the IPC Vice
President Miguel Sagarra, the Medical Director Paul Van De Vliet and
Xavier Gonzales the CEO of the IPC.
We have discussed the possibility of an additional classification
within INAS-FID for athletes with DS.
If such a Classification was agreed it would mean that swimmers
with DS would be recognised by the IPC thus giving these swimmers access
to IPC recognised events and, in the longer term, potentially the
Paralympics.
The way forward offers the following opportunities.
- DSISO
pursues an agreement with INAS-FID which will result in the
integration of their swimmers with the ‘new’ DS class.
This will offer two opportunities for DS swimmers:
- To
swim in INAS-FID events in the DS class,
- To
swim in DSISO events as now.
This
option would involve the registration of swimmers to DSISO as now (with
an individual cost) and also the registration of swimmers to INAS-FID
($400 per country [but no cost at all if the country is already a member
of INAS-FID] but no charge for the swimmers individually).
- DSISO
disbands completely and encourages all DS swimmers to register with
INAS-FID.
- Through
an existing organisation in their country that is a member of INAS-FID.
- By
joining INAS-FID as a new member.
I suggest that everyone considers these options and we debate this
at the 2010 Sports Assembly. In
the meantime I would be very happy to discuss the implications of these
options either now or informally whilst we are in
Portugal
or by e-mail when we all return home.
Geoff
Smedley, C.E.O.
|